header-logo header-logo

17 July 2019
Issue: 7849 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Diversity statistics paint a mixed picture in court

Nearly a third of judges in the courts and 46% of tribunal judges are women, according to the 2019 judicial diversity statistics.

Women also make up 23% of judges in the Court of Appeal and 27% in the High Court as well as more than half the non-legal members of tribunals. The figures, released this week, are correct as at 1 April 2019.

The future looks more evenly matched between the sexes―about half of court judges below the age of 50 years old are women, and women outnumber men among tribunal judges aged 40-49 (54% women) and 50-59 (52% women).

In the most recent year of appointments, 2018–19, 45% of the 143 judges in court appointed to a senior judicial role were women.

One third of court judges come from a non-barrister background, whether solicitor, CILEx or another route. This figure rises to nearly two-thirds for tribunal judges.

BAME (black and minority ethnic) representation among court judges is lower than in the general population as a whole, although more BAME judges are joining the judiciary than leaving it. BAME representation among tribunal judges matches the general population.

As far as magistrates are concerned, more than half are women (56%), 12% are BAME and just over half are 60 years old or above.

Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, in a joint statement with Sir Ernest Ryder, the senior president of tribunals, said they were ‘encouraged to see that the number of women judges (in both the courts and tribunals) and non-legal tribunal members has increased. 

‘The Judicial Diversity Committee, chaired by Lady Justice Hallett, has set out the steps it plans to take over the next 12 months to reach a more diverse pool of lawyers and focus its efforts on attracting new talent and supporting career progression. Amongst other measures, the committee is working to support and encourage solicitors to join the judiciary.’

Lord Burnett and Sir Ernest said under-represented groups will be given support to become judges through the pre-application judicial education programme, which was launched in April by the government, judiciary, Judicial Appointments Commission and professional bodies.

Issue: 7849 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll