header-logo header-logo

04 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Divorce

Amin v Amin [2017] EWCA Civ 1114, [2017] All ER (D) 197 (Jul)

The judge had jurisdiction to make a pension sharing order and to make supplemental orders by way of enforcement of his previous lump sum order, which had ordered the husband to pay the wife £350,000 and which the husband had failed to pay. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the husband’s appeal, held that the husband’s attack on the judge’s exercise of discretion in utilising part of the husband’s pension fund by way of enforcement was hopeless. It had been perfectly proper for the judge to have proceeded as he had.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll