header-logo header-logo

Divorce—Ancillary relief—Financial provision

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, [2011] All ER (D) 231 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Nicholas Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ, 28 Jan 2011

The Court of Appeal has overruled the decision in GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) EWHC 611 (Fam) [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May).

Martin Pointer QC and Geoffrey Kingscote (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the wife.

Lucy Stone QC and Marcus Lazarides (instructed by Levison Meltzer Pigott) for the husband.

The parties married in 1996 when the husband was the sole owner of a company which had been in operation for 10 years. They separated in 2006 and a decree absolute of divorce was made in the wife’s favour. She commenced proceedings for ancillary relief. While those proceedings were underway the husband sold the company for £25m. The net assets of the parties at the date of the hearing was £25m. The wife’s claim was for a lump sum payment by the husband of £10m. She conceded that the husband’s ownership

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll