header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Divorce—Ancillary relief—Financial provision

Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, [2011] All ER (D) 231 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Nicholas Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ, 28 Jan 2011

The Court of Appeal has overruled the decision in GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) EWHC 611 (Fam) [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May).

Martin Pointer QC and Geoffrey Kingscote (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the wife.

Lucy Stone QC and Marcus Lazarides (instructed by Levison Meltzer Pigott) for the husband.

The parties married in 1996 when the husband was the sole owner of a company which had been in operation for 10 years. They separated in 2006 and a decree absolute of divorce was made in the wife’s favour. She commenced proceedings for ancillary relief. While those proceedings were underway the husband sold the company for £25m. The net assets of the parties at the date of the hearing was £25m. The wife’s claim was for a lump sum payment by the husband of £10m. She conceded that the husband’s ownership

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll