header-logo header-logo

16 February 2021
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Divorce gets messy post-Brexit

Thousands of divorcing couples could face post-Brexit jurisdictional issues, a family lawyer has warned.

About one in three UK divorces involves a foreign element: for example, where one spouse is from abroad. Previously, jurisdiction was decided by who filed the court papers first. Now, the courts will decide. 

Andrew Watson, partner at Osbornes Law, said: ‘A number of factors will be taken into account, such as where people live, where they lived together and where the children go to school or spend their holidays, so deciding where a divorce should take place isn’t that simple.

‘This is going to create further disputes between couples at a time where there are plenty of disputes anyway and this could well lead to a flood of litigation. There is the potential for this to get quite messy.’

Issue: 7921 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll