header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007 / Joanne Edwards , James Brown
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Divorce law update

H v H

The latest divorce case to generate a flurry of media interest has been H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 88 (Apr) heard by the Mr Justice Charles in the High Court.

The relevance of the case is the fact that it considers how a husband’s future income should be applied in those cases where there are sufficient capital assets for a clean break to take place but the husband has a substantial income going forwards.

The husband and wife married in 1985 and had four children. It is a “big money case” with substantial wealth built up during the course of the marriage as a result of the significant earnings of the husband as a banker. The wife had been a teacher and stopped work relatively soon after the start of the parties’ marriage.

Following the parties’ separation, the husband continued to work, enjoying a high level of remuneration. The wife continued to act as the primary caretaker of the children—aged 18, 14, 11

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll