header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007 / Joanne Edwards , James Brown
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Divorce law update

H v H

The latest divorce case to generate a flurry of media interest has been H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 88 (Apr) heard by the Mr Justice Charles in the High Court.

The relevance of the case is the fact that it considers how a husband’s future income should be applied in those cases where there are sufficient capital assets for a clean break to take place but the husband has a substantial income going forwards.

The husband and wife married in 1985 and had four children. It is a “big money case” with substantial wealth built up during the course of the marriage as a result of the significant earnings of the husband as a banker. The wife had been a teacher and stopped work relatively soon after the start of the parties’ marriage.

Following the parties’ separation, the husband continued to work, enjoying a high level of remuneration. The wife continued to act as the primary caretaker of the children—aged 18, 14, 11

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll