header-logo header-logo

16 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Divorce & money to separate

Divorce proceedings are to be ‘de-linked’ from financial proceedings such as applications for ancillary relief, as of 19 June.

The decision was publicly announced this week, in a letter to family judges and court staff from Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, and Kevin Sadler, Deputy Chief Executive of HM Courts & Tribunals Service. It follows a successful pilot in the south west region that reduced delays by up to two weeks.

Family law solicitor David Burrows said: ‘Money, though generally the most substantial issue, is “ancillary” (subsidiary) to divorce. The new plans will “de-link” money from divorce so that administratively a separate file will be created; though conclusion of money proceedings must still wait for the divorce to be finalised.’

In his latest blog, View from the President’s Chambers, Munby P said only a minority of divorces give rise to a money claim, and the concentration of divorce cases in a limited number of regional divorce centres was putting the administration of ancillary relief under ‘unnecessary and avoidable strains’.

Issue: 7750 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll