header-logo header-logo

Do me a favour!

20 October 2014 / Rebecca Owen-Howes
Issue: 7628 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
owen-howes

Does price parity mean price increase when it comes to most favoured nation clauses? Rebecca Owen-Howes reports

Most favoured nation (MFN) clauses (also referred to as most favoured customer clauses) are contractual obligations by one party to offer its best terms to another party. Under a MFN, the seller promises Buyer A that it will not offer Buyer B better terms unless it first offers those, or better terms, to Buyer A. The term MFN also includes price parity agreements, where products are sold on different platforms (often relevant in the context of internet selling).

In the past, competition authorities, including the European Commission, have not appeared to be overly concerned with MFN clauses. The general consensus among competition practitioners was that such provisions could benefit competition by reducing supply chain costs, transaction costs and delays. In the last 10 years or so, however, MFN clauses have started to attract the concern that they may be used to achieve anti-competitive objectives or have an anti-competitive effect. In particular, when in the hands

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Insolvency and restructuring practice welcomes new partner

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
back-to-top-scroll