header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

Nature of suspension

One of the most vexed areas of employment concerning healthcare professionals, including doctors, involves the suspension of a professional from his work. Following some alleged wrongdoing, a doctor may be suspended from duties for months, even years, while drawing full pay, plus any additional expenses to be met by his employers in hiring a locum tenens to cover for the suspended doctor. Not surprisingly, no one is happy with the arrangements involving suspensions but the practice continues.

In Mezey v South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust [2007] EWCA Civ 106 the claimant was a consultant psychiatrist. In a case now made notorious through recent publicity, a patient of hers suffering from paranoid schizophrenia had killed a retired banker who was bicycling through a park in south west London. Internal inquiries were held into the matter in addition to an external independent inquiry.

It is the intention of the doctor’s employers to initiate disciplinary proceedings against her later in the year. Meanwhile, the doctor has voluntarily undertaken not to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll