header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

Nature of suspension

One of the most vexed areas of employment concerning healthcare professionals, including doctors, involves the suspension of a professional from his work. Following some alleged wrongdoing, a doctor may be suspended from duties for months, even years, while drawing full pay, plus any additional expenses to be met by his employers in hiring a locum tenens to cover for the suspended doctor. Not surprisingly, no one is happy with the arrangements involving suspensions but the practice continues.

In Mezey v South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust [2007] EWCA Civ 106 the claimant was a consultant psychiatrist. In a case now made notorious through recent publicity, a patient of hers suffering from paranoid schizophrenia had killed a retired banker who was bicycling through a park in south west London. Internal inquiries were held into the matter in addition to an external independent inquiry.

It is the intention of the doctor’s employers to initiate disciplinary proceedings against her later in the year. Meanwhile, the doctor has voluntarily undertaken not to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll