header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

Nature of suspension

One of the most vexed areas of employment concerning healthcare professionals, including doctors, involves the suspension of a professional from his work. Following some alleged wrongdoing, a doctor may be suspended from duties for months, even years, while drawing full pay, plus any additional expenses to be met by his employers in hiring a locum tenens to cover for the suspended doctor. Not surprisingly, no one is happy with the arrangements involving suspensions but the practice continues.

In Mezey v South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust [2007] EWCA Civ 106 the claimant was a consultant psychiatrist. In a case now made notorious through recent publicity, a patient of hers suffering from paranoid schizophrenia had killed a retired banker who was bicycling through a park in south west London. Internal inquiries were held into the matter in addition to an external independent inquiry.

It is the intention of the doctor’s employers to initiate disciplinary proceedings against her later in the year. Meanwhile, the doctor has voluntarily undertaken not to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll