header-logo header-logo

15 April 2009 / B. Mahendra
Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

News

Occasionally the law expects citizens to perform some act which, for reasons of illness or disorder, individuals may not be able to accomplish. This matter came up for adjudication when the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court took up a case stated from a decision of South Yorkshire justices in Piggott v Director of Public Prosecutions( 2008) The Times,10 March, [2008] All ER (D) 114 (Feb). The defendant had been required to produce a specimen of breath under s 7(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) which by s 7(6) makes it an offence to fail to do so without reasonable excuse. The defendant had made four attempts to produce a specimen but had failed to do so. Later, at trial, an expert in respiratory medicine had opined there had been a medical reason for this failure, namely that the defendant suffered from bronchial asthma and a hyperventilation syndrome. This opinion had been accepted by the justices. The issue was whether or not the defendant had informed the police officers involved whether she suffered a medical disability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll