header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

15 April 2009 / B. Mahendra
Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

News

Occasionally the law expects citizens to perform some act which, for reasons of illness or disorder, individuals may not be able to accomplish. This matter came up for adjudication when the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court took up a case stated from a decision of South Yorkshire justices in Piggott v Director of Public Prosecutions( 2008) The Times,10 March, [2008] All ER (D) 114 (Feb). The defendant had been required to produce a specimen of breath under s 7(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) which by s 7(6) makes it an offence to fail to do so without reasonable excuse. The defendant had made four attempts to produce a specimen but had failed to do so. Later, at trial, an expert in respiratory medicine had opined there had been a medical reason for this failure, namely that the defendant suffered from bronchial asthma and a hyperventilation syndrome. This opinion had been accepted by the justices. The issue was whether or not the defendant had informed the police officers involved whether she suffered a medical disability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll