header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

15 April 2009 / B. Mahendra
Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

News

Occasionally the law expects citizens to perform some act which, for reasons of illness or disorder, individuals may not be able to accomplish. This matter came up for adjudication when the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court took up a case stated from a decision of South Yorkshire justices in Piggott v Director of Public Prosecutions( 2008) The Times,10 March, [2008] All ER (D) 114 (Feb). The defendant had been required to produce a specimen of breath under s 7(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) which by s 7(6) makes it an offence to fail to do so without reasonable excuse. The defendant had made four attempts to produce a specimen but had failed to do so. Later, at trial, an expert in respiratory medicine had opined there had been a medical reason for this failure, namely that the defendant suffered from bronchial asthma and a hyperventilation syndrome. This opinion had been accepted by the justices. The issue was whether or not the defendant had informed the police officers involved whether she suffered a medical disability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll