header-logo header-logo

15 April 2009 / B. Mahendra
Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

News

Occasionally the law expects citizens to perform some act which, for reasons of illness or disorder, individuals may not be able to accomplish. This matter came up for adjudication when the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court took up a case stated from a decision of South Yorkshire justices in Piggott v Director of Public Prosecutions( 2008) The Times,10 March, [2008] All ER (D) 114 (Feb). The defendant had been required to produce a specimen of breath under s 7(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) which by s 7(6) makes it an offence to fail to do so without reasonable excuse. The defendant had made four attempts to produce a specimen but had failed to do so. Later, at trial, an expert in respiratory medicine had opined there had been a medical reason for this failure, namely that the defendant suffered from bronchial asthma and a hyperventilation syndrome. This opinion had been accepted by the justices. The issue was whether or not the defendant had informed the police officers involved whether she suffered a medical disability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll