header-logo header-logo

04 August 2023 / Tori Adams
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Family
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse & equal opportunities for change

132894
A serious rethink is required as to how female perpetrators of domestic abuse can be given the same chance as male perpetrators to reform their behaviour: Tori Adams reports
  • Mothers who have been found to be perpetrators of domestic abuse face difficulties accessing support and demonstrating change to allow for contact with their child.
  • The Domestic Abuse Perpetrator Programme is not currently available to women—particularly its group sessions, which are an integral part of the reform process.

When reference is made to domestic abuse in proceedings brought under the Children Act 1989, and consideration is being given as to what an ‘abuser’ can do in order to secure contact with their children, it is generally assumed that reference is being made to a male perpetrator. It has long been the position that if a father is found to have been a perpetrator of domestic abuse, he is required to complete the Domestic Abuse Perpetrator Programme (DAPP) before he is able to have direct, or unsupervised, contact

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll