header-logo header-logo

Don’t blame the judges!

02 July 2020 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
23520
Dr Michael Arnheim advocates the need for Parliament (not judges) to step into the law-making breach

In brief

  • Under our constitution, policy-making at the national level is the responsibility of democratically-elected governments and ministers accountable to Parliament, not of unelected judges .
  • Why Parliament should assert its power to guide judges by means of legislation, on the basis of the sovereignty of Parliament, the bedrock principle of the UK Constitution.

Two recently retired UK Supreme Court (UKSC) justices have highlighted the serious plight of English law. Lord Sumption has expressed concern at ‘our persistent habit of looking for legal solutions to what are really political problems’. (Trials of the State, 2019, Location 857). This results in unelected judges making decisions that should be made by a democratically elected parliament or government.

Lord Neuberger focused on the different but equally serious phenomenon of the ‘disarray and a marked lack of reliable principle’ in the field of tort, (https://bit.ly/3iiu86W) which was shown in my recent book Anglo-American Law:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll