header-logo header-logo

02 July 2020 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Don’t blame the judges!

23520
Dr Michael Arnheim advocates the need for Parliament (not judges) to step into the law-making breach

In brief

  • Under our constitution, policy-making at the national level is the responsibility of democratically-elected governments and ministers accountable to Parliament, not of unelected judges .
  • Why Parliament should assert its power to guide judges by means of legislation, on the basis of the sovereignty of Parliament, the bedrock principle of the UK Constitution.

Two recently retired UK Supreme Court (UKSC) justices have highlighted the serious plight of English law. Lord Sumption has expressed concern at ‘our persistent habit of looking for legal solutions to what are really political problems’. (Trials of the State, 2019, Location 857). This results in unelected judges making decisions that should be made by a democratically elected parliament or government.

Lord Neuberger focused on the different but equally serious phenomenon of the ‘disarray and a marked lack of reliable principle’ in the field of tort, (https://bit.ly/3iiu86W) which was shown in my recent book Anglo-American Law:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll