header-logo header-logo

Don’t blame the judges!

02 July 2020 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
23520
Dr Michael Arnheim advocates the need for Parliament (not judges) to step into the law-making breach

In brief

  • Under our constitution, policy-making at the national level is the responsibility of democratically-elected governments and ministers accountable to Parliament, not of unelected judges .
  • Why Parliament should assert its power to guide judges by means of legislation, on the basis of the sovereignty of Parliament, the bedrock principle of the UK Constitution.

Two recently retired UK Supreme Court (UKSC) justices have highlighted the serious plight of English law. Lord Sumption has expressed concern at ‘our persistent habit of looking for legal solutions to what are really political problems’. (Trials of the State, 2019, Location 857). This results in unelected judges making decisions that should be made by a democratically elected parliament or government.

Lord Neuberger focused on the different but equally serious phenomenon of the ‘disarray and a marked lack of reliable principle’ in the field of tort, (https://bit.ly/3iiu86W) which was shown in my recent book Anglo-American Law:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll