header-logo header-logo

10 January 2025 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Don’t even think about it…

202668
Injunctive relief is possible before a wrong has even taken place: Nicholas Dobson explores quia timet relief in light of a recent decision
  • Whether a case is appropriate for quia timet relief must be considered in the light of all relevant circumstances known at the time of hearing or trial. The test is what is fair and just in all the circumstances.
  • A judgment must be made as to the balance to be struck between Arts 8 and 10 in the light of s 12(3) of the Human Rights Act 1988 regarding freedom of expression.

Injunctions are discretionary equitable remedies. Central to equitable principles is whether a course of action is conscionable (consistent with what is reasonably considered to be right and proper). So, a famous equitable maxim is that the person seeking an equitable remedy must come with clean hands. In other words, those seeking equity must themselves be free from taint of fraud or material wrongdoing.

Unconscionability was a factor in a recent case concerning the potential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll