header-logo header-logo

10 January 2025 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Don’t even think about it…

202668
Injunctive relief is possible before a wrong has even taken place: Nicholas Dobson explores quia timet relief in light of a recent decision
  • Whether a case is appropriate for quia timet relief must be considered in the light of all relevant circumstances known at the time of hearing or trial. The test is what is fair and just in all the circumstances.
  • A judgment must be made as to the balance to be struck between Arts 8 and 10 in the light of s 12(3) of the Human Rights Act 1988 regarding freedom of expression.

Injunctions are discretionary equitable remedies. Central to equitable principles is whether a course of action is conscionable (consistent with what is reasonably considered to be right and proper). So, a famous equitable maxim is that the person seeking an equitable remedy must come with clean hands. In other words, those seeking equity must themselves be free from taint of fraud or material wrongdoing.

Unconscionability was a factor in a recent case concerning the potential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll