header-logo header-logo

11 March 2016 / Naomi O’Higgins
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Don’t shoot the deputy

001_nlj_7690_higgins

Naomi O’Higgins explains the role & responsibilities of deputies under the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Where a person, referred to in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) and in this article as “P”, no longer has mental capacity to manage his or her own property and affairs, but did not make a power of attorney while he or she had capacity, it is often necessary for an application to be made to the Court of Protection (COP) for the appointment of a person, known as a deputy, to make day-to-day decisions about and to manage and supervise P’s property and affairs.

A deputy can also be appointed to deal with P’s health and welfare, but the focus of this article is property and affairs deputyships.

Appointment of a deputy

A decision as to whether to appoint a deputy is one that must be taken in P’s best interests. Section 4 of MCA 2005 provides a checklist of factors that anyone, including the court, making a decision must consider when deciding what is in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll