header-logo header-logo

11 March 2016 / Naomi O’Higgins
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Don’t shoot the deputy

001_nlj_7690_higgins

Naomi O’Higgins explains the role & responsibilities of deputies under the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Where a person, referred to in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) and in this article as “P”, no longer has mental capacity to manage his or her own property and affairs, but did not make a power of attorney while he or she had capacity, it is often necessary for an application to be made to the Court of Protection (COP) for the appointment of a person, known as a deputy, to make day-to-day decisions about and to manage and supervise P’s property and affairs.

A deputy can also be appointed to deal with P’s health and welfare, but the focus of this article is property and affairs deputyships.

Appointment of a deputy

A decision as to whether to appoint a deputy is one that must be taken in P’s best interests. Section 4 of MCA 2005 provides a checklist of factors that anyone, including the court, making a decision must consider when deciding what is in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll