header-logo header-logo

02 June 2020
Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Don’t sue, say judges

Senior judges and legal academics have called for a ‘breathing space’ break in litigation to allow firms to recover in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic

The group of judges and lawyers, from independent research centre, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL), predict a wave of litigation as parties trigger default clauses in contracts and counterparties maintain they are excused from performance. They have developed recommendations to minimise the risk of a deluge of disputes.

In a ‘concept note’ published last week, ‘Breathing Space’, the lawyers warn: ‘The effects of the pandemic are magnified by supply chains which over the past three decades have become increasingly global. This has implications for disputes as well, since the disruption of a single contract can disrupt the entire chain. One dispute can set off a chain reaction of disputes.’

They argue that the best approach in the case of breached contracts is for the law ‘to support negotiated solutions to make viable contracts blighted by the pandemic work; to bring contracts made unviable by the pandemic to an end in an equitable manner’.

Where negotiation fails, the lawyers suggest parties be encouraged towards mediation or other alternative dispute resolution methods and, where court proceedings are needed, that they take place online to avoid clogging up the courts.

Sir William Blair, a former judge of the London Commercial Court, said: ‘Faced with an unprecedented crisis, the law must provide a solid, practical and predictable foundation for the resolution of disputes and the confidence necessary for a recovery.

‘New thinking is required, and there is every reason for optimism that we can succeed.’

Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll