header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Andrew Harris
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Community care , Employment
printer mail-detail

Don't blame me

When should the finger be pointed at employers rather than medical staff? Andrew Harris investigates

A short while after childbirth in an NHS hospital, Mayra Cabrera died of a heart attack, caused by mistakenly being given the drug Bupivacaine intravenously, instead of the similarly styled saline drip. The two infusion bags looked identical and were stored in the same unlocked drawer; similar incidents have occurred in other hospitals. The coroner‘s inquest ruled that Mrs Cabrera was unlawfully killed after gross negligence by the trust; the widower called for a prosecution against the midwife. What should the test of negligence be in such cases? Do we apply the Bolam test, ie “not acting in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men, skilled in that particular art” (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118), to the hapless midwife, who put up the infusion, or a test of primary liability of the trust?

 

CONTROLLING MINDS

Currently for such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll