header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Andrew Harris
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Community care , Employment
printer mail-detail

Don't blame me

When should the finger be pointed at employers rather than medical staff? Andrew Harris investigates

A short while after childbirth in an NHS hospital, Mayra Cabrera died of a heart attack, caused by mistakenly being given the drug Bupivacaine intravenously, instead of the similarly styled saline drip. The two infusion bags looked identical and were stored in the same unlocked drawer; similar incidents have occurred in other hospitals. The coroner‘s inquest ruled that Mrs Cabrera was unlawfully killed after gross negligence by the trust; the widower called for a prosecution against the midwife. What should the test of negligence be in such cases? Do we apply the Bolam test, ie “not acting in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men, skilled in that particular art” (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118), to the hapless midwife, who put up the infusion, or a test of primary liability of the trust?

 

CONTROLLING MINDS

Currently for such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll