header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Andrew Harris
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Community care , Employment
printer mail-detail

Don't blame me

When should the finger be pointed at employers rather than medical staff? Andrew Harris investigates

A short while after childbirth in an NHS hospital, Mayra Cabrera died of a heart attack, caused by mistakenly being given the drug Bupivacaine intravenously, instead of the similarly styled saline drip. The two infusion bags looked identical and were stored in the same unlocked drawer; similar incidents have occurred in other hospitals. The coroner‘s inquest ruled that Mrs Cabrera was unlawfully killed after gross negligence by the trust; the widower called for a prosecution against the midwife. What should the test of negligence be in such cases? Do we apply the Bolam test, ie “not acting in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men, skilled in that particular art” (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118), to the hapless midwife, who put up the infusion, or a test of primary liability of the trust?

 

CONTROLLING MINDS

Currently for such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll