header-logo header-logo

15 December 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

The London office of international law firm Dorsey & Whitney has expanded its dispute resolution team with the appointment of associate Jonathan Christy. The firm’s London base, its European hub, is home to more than 25 lawyers and focuses on mid-market and cross-border transactions, commercial litigation and arbitration, supported by a strong transatlantic capability. Jonathan joins from Mills & Reeve, bringing eight years’ experience across corporate and commercial disputes.

An accomplished disputes lawyer, Jonathan has particular expertise in founder and shareholder issues, directors’ duties claims and breach of contract matters, with experience spanning both litigation and arbitration. Speaking on his arrival, he said he was excited to join a team with an ‘impressive disputes practice advising multinational clients on complex cross-border matters’, adding that the firm’s ‘collaborative culture and entrepreneurial approach’ offers ‘an excellent platform for development’.

Aymen Khoury, partner and head of the London disputes team, welcomed the appointment, noting that it comes at ‘a pivotal time’ as the practice continues to grow following significant recent matters, including major international arbitrations. He said Jonathan’s expertise ‘further strengthens our ability to support our established international client base’ and reflects the team’s ambition in commercial litigation and arbitration.

Dorsey & Whitney’s London disputes team, led by Aymen, advises on commercial matters before the English High Court and in international arbitrations, with a particular focus on the Middle East. The team also includes partner Joseph Lewin, recognised as a Next Generation Partner in The Legal 500 2025, who specialises in high-value cross-border dispute resolution and international arbitration.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll