header-logo header-logo

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

15 December 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

The London office of international law firm Dorsey & Whitney has expanded its dispute resolution team with the appointment of associate Jonathan Christy. The firm’s London base, its European hub, is home to more than 25 lawyers and focuses on mid-market and cross-border transactions, commercial litigation and arbitration, supported by a strong transatlantic capability. Jonathan joins from Mills & Reeve, bringing eight years’ experience across corporate and commercial disputes.

An accomplished disputes lawyer, Jonathan has particular expertise in founder and shareholder issues, directors’ duties claims and breach of contract matters, with experience spanning both litigation and arbitration. Speaking on his arrival, he said he was excited to join a team with an ‘impressive disputes practice advising multinational clients on complex cross-border matters’, adding that the firm’s ‘collaborative culture and entrepreneurial approach’ offers ‘an excellent platform for development’.

Aymen Khoury, partner and head of the London disputes team, welcomed the appointment, noting that it comes at ‘a pivotal time’ as the practice continues to grow following significant recent matters, including major international arbitrations. He said Jonathan’s expertise ‘further strengthens our ability to support our established international client base’ and reflects the team’s ambition in commercial litigation and arbitration.

Dorsey & Whitney’s London disputes team, led by Aymen, advises on commercial matters before the English High Court and in international arbitrations, with a particular focus on the Middle East. The team also includes partner Joseph Lewin, recognised as a Next Generation Partner in The Legal 500 2025, who specialises in high-value cross-border dispute resolution and international arbitration.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll