header-logo header-logo

02 March 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Double jeopardy?

When is a marriage not a marriage, asks Jonathan Herring

It is increasingly common to marry overseas. In 2010 around 74,000 couples did. Rarely does that cause legal problems, but it can do as Galloway v Goldstein [2012] EWHC 60 (Fam) demonstrates.

Married on two continents

The husband was English and his wife American. Perhaps concerned about the rates of marriage breakdown, or perhaps just for the fun of it, they decided to get married twice: once in Connecticut, US, in April 1999 and then again one month later in England. There would have been no problem if the English ceremony had been in the nature of a blessing. But, it was not, it was a full marriage, registered at the General Register Office of England and Wales. By 2004, the marriage had broken down and was dissolved by the Superior Court of Connecticut. The US proceedings made no mention of the English ceremony, but made appropriate financial orders.

Some years later, the husband became concerned about the status of the English ceremony.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll