header-logo header-logo

Double jeopardy?

02 March 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

When is a marriage not a marriage, asks Jonathan Herring

It is increasingly common to marry overseas. In 2010 around 74,000 couples did. Rarely does that cause legal problems, but it can do as Galloway v Goldstein [2012] EWHC 60 (Fam) demonstrates.

Married on two continents

The husband was English and his wife American. Perhaps concerned about the rates of marriage breakdown, or perhaps just for the fun of it, they decided to get married twice: once in Connecticut, US, in April 1999 and then again one month later in England. There would have been no problem if the English ceremony had been in the nature of a blessing. But, it was not, it was a full marriage, registered at the General Register Office of England and Wales. By 2004, the marriage had broken down and was dissolved by the Superior Court of Connecticut. The US proceedings made no mention of the English ceremony, but made appropriate financial orders.

Some years later, the husband became concerned about the status of the English ceremony.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll