header-logo header-logo

Divorce up in downturn

14 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tough economy contributes to marital breakdowns

Family lawyers have attributed rising divorce rates to the financial stress of coping with the economic downturn.

The number of divorces in England and Wales rose by 4.9% in 2010, to nearly 120,000 couples, according to figures released last week by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Couples in their early 40s were the age group most likely to divorce. Half the couples had at least one child below the age of 16.

The rise in the divorce rate is the first since 2003, which saw a peak of 150,000 couples severing ties. The rate has declined since then as fewer couples have chosen to tie the knot.
 

According to the ONS, the rise could be due to the strain of the economic downturn, and some people may want to divorce while their incomes are low so they get a more favourable settlement.

On the other hand, as the ONS points out, tough economic times can make some struggling couples stick together because they can’t afford to separate.

Family lawyers say financial strains often contribute to relationship break-ups.

Caroline Falkus, partner at niche family law firm Bross Bennett, says: “The ongoing economic pressures of recent times are directly responsible for sowing the seeds that grow into full marriage breakdowns.

“We see many clients whose arguments and disagreements started when they suffer the stress of financial hardship leading to worries about trying to pay the bills, forced redundancies or that their businesses may go under. It is no surprise there has been a rise in the number of divorces and if the current economic problems continue then this is a depressing pattern that is likely to persist.”

Grant Howell, partner at Charles Russell, says: “Divorce figures are back on the rise with financial pressures in the economic crisis adding to the strain on married couples.”

He calls for greater rights for cohabiting couples “to address the hardship and injustice suffered by cohabitants on breakdown of the relationship, as identified by the Law Commission”.

Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll