header-logo header-logo

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Draft Brexit treaty published amid confusion

The EU published its draft Brexit withdrawal treaty this week amid escalating confusion about the role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), clamour over the transition period, a potentially game-changing move by the Labour Party on the customs union issue and news that the Scottish Government will publish its own Brexit Bill.

Chief EU negotiator Michel Barnier pre-empted publication of the 120-page draft treaty with the promise that its 168 paragraphs would contain no surprises. However, the draft treaty, drawn up by the other 27 EU member states, gives the ECJ jurisdiction over any treaty disputes once Britain leaves.

This position conflicts with Prime Minister Theresa May’s stated view that the ECJ should have no jurisdiction over Britain after the post-Brexit transition period expires.

Senior judges including Lady Hale, President of the Supreme Court, have identified the future role of the ECJ as a key concern, repeatedly calling on the government to provide more clarity.

Meanwhile, Barnier warned there were ‘significant areas of disagreement’ on when the transition period will end. Speaking in Brussels this week, he said the EU wanted it to end on 31 December 2020 but the UK has not yet specified a date and apparently wants it to be ‘open-ended’.

The draft treaty also contains the option to keep Northern Ireland in the single market and customs union.

Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn staked a claim to the Brexit middle ground in a speech this week, signalling support for British membership of a customs union with the EU. He said Labour would seek to negotiate a new EU-UK customs union ‘to avoid the imposition of tariffs on goods traded within Europe, and to help solve the Brexit conundrum at the Irish border’.

North of the border, the Scottish Government published its UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill in the Holyrood Parliament. It is similar to Westminster’s EU Withdrawal Bill, currently passing through Committee Stage in the Lords, but focuses on devolved matters such as health, agriculture and economic development and would be used if MSPs reject the Westminster Bill. Wales may follow suit.

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll