header-logo header-logo

07 June 2012
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Driving up insurance costs

OFT reports that motor insurance practices may be inflating premiums

Motor insurers may be driving up the costs of premiums by as much as £225m a year by exploiting revenue-generating opportunities in the system, an Office of Fair Trading (OFT) report has found.

The problems stem from the fact the at-fault driver’s insurer must pay for repairs and replacement vehicles yet has little control over who does the work or how much it costs.

Typically, the OFT suggests, not-at-fault drivers inflate the costs of the other side by about £560 because: insurers refer drivers to credit hire organisations that charge higher daily rates for a replacement car in exchange for a referral fee of between £250 and £400 per car hire; and drivers receive replacement vehicles for longer than necessary.

The cost of repairs may also be inflated by about £155 because certain insurers receive referral fees and rebates from repairers, paint suppliers and parts suppliers, while some insurers have agreements in place where repairers are allowed to charge higher labour rates when repairing the vehicles of not-at-fault drivers.

The OFT, which published its report last week, has provisionally decided to refer the private motor insurance market to the Competition Commission, and will reach a final decision by October.

Charlotte Hardie, road traffic accident supervisor at Glaisyers Solicitors, says: “What the OFT has unveiled is that the issue of personal injury referral fees is not the only problem.”

Hardie says making the Association of British Insurers’ (ABI) general terms agreement—a voluntary agreement between insurers and hire companies to pre-agree hire costs—mandatory might bring premiums down.

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) responds: “Insurers have finally been caught with their hands in the cookie jar.”

APIL president Karl Tonks says: “For years, the insurance industry has sought to blame anyone and anything but itself and its own sharp practices for high insurance premiums.”

However, Nick Starling, the ABI director of general insurance, welcomes the OFT report.

“Regulation of all players in the market to tackle excessive costs is needed, and we hope that the work by the Competition Commission will bring much needed reforms that in turn will result in lower car insurance premiums for consumers.”

Issue: 7517 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll