header-logo header-logo

DTI to overhaul dispute resolution

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Legal News , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

The 2004 employment dispute resolution procedures could be abolished under new government proposals.

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) launched a root-and-branch review last week, following the independent review Better Dispute Resolution by Michael Gibbons, which was published on the same day.

Gibbons, chair of Hertfordshire Family Mediation Service, commends a “greatly increased use of mediation” in employment disputes, and he notes: “Employment tribunals process a wide variety of claims, from simple wage claims worth less than £100 to very complex discrimination cases with unlimited damages.

“Yet all cases that do not settle and are not resolved go to a judicial hearing. The costs to parties and the state can be highly disproportionate to the value of the claim.”

The current statutory procedures, which have proved unpopular with many employment lawyers, have had “unintended consequences that outweighed their benefits”, according to Gibbons.

The DTI wants to introduce a more streamlined dispute process.
 
Proposals under consideration in Success at Work: Resolving Disputes in the Workplace include:

  • repealing the statutory dis­missal and grievance procedures;
  • abolishing
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll