header-logo header-logo

DTI to overhaul dispute resolution

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Legal News , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

The 2004 employment dispute resolution procedures could be abolished under new government proposals.

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) launched a root-and-branch review last week, following the independent review Better Dispute Resolution by Michael Gibbons, which was published on the same day.

Gibbons, chair of Hertfordshire Family Mediation Service, commends a “greatly increased use of mediation” in employment disputes, and he notes: “Employment tribunals process a wide variety of claims, from simple wage claims worth less than £100 to very complex discrimination cases with unlimited damages.

“Yet all cases that do not settle and are not resolved go to a judicial hearing. The costs to parties and the state can be highly disproportionate to the value of the claim.”

The current statutory procedures, which have proved unpopular with many employment lawyers, have had “unintended consequences that outweighed their benefits”, according to Gibbons.

The DTI wants to introduce a more streamlined dispute process.
 
Proposals under consideration in Success at Work: Resolving Disputes in the Workplace include:

  • repealing the statutory dis­missal and grievance procedures;
  • abolishing
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll