header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Legal News , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

DTI to overhaul dispute resolution

The 2004 employment dispute resolution procedures could be abolished under new government proposals.

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) launched a root-and-branch review last week, following the independent review Better Dispute Resolution by Michael Gibbons, which was published on the same day.

Gibbons, chair of Hertfordshire Family Mediation Service, commends a “greatly increased use of mediation” in employment disputes, and he notes: “Employment tribunals process a wide variety of claims, from simple wage claims worth less than £100 to very complex discrimination cases with unlimited damages.

“Yet all cases that do not settle and are not resolved go to a judicial hearing. The costs to parties and the state can be highly disproportionate to the value of the claim.”

The current statutory procedures, which have proved unpopular with many employment lawyers, have had “unintended consequences that outweighed their benefits”, according to Gibbons.

The DTI wants to introduce a more streamlined dispute process.
 
Proposals under consideration in Success at Work: Resolving Disputes in the Workplace include:

  • repealing the statutory dis­missal and grievance procedures;
  • abolishing
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll