header-logo header-logo

Dubai boosts its disputes presence with Decree 34

10 December 2021 / Charlotte Bijlani , Soraya Corm-Bakhos
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Features , Profession , International justice , ADR
printer mail-detail
66831
Charlotte Bijlani and Soraya Corm-Bakhos chart the arbitration landscape in Dubai and the changes made by Decree 34
  • Dubai Decree No 34 of 2021 significantly alters the arbitration landscape in Dubai.
  • It is to be hoped that Decree 34 will achieve its objective to strengthen Dubai’s position as a global centre for alternative dispute resolution.

Parties wishing to arbitrate in the UAE benefit from a wide array of arbitration options: they may choose to seat their arbitration onshore in mainland Dubai (or in another Emirate) or offshore within the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) or the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM).

Background

  • Both the DIFC and the ADGM constitute autonomous jurisdictions with their own courts and judicial systems modelled on the common law.
  • A DIFC seat will trigger the application of the DIFC Arbitration Law (DIFC Law No 1 of 2008) as the procedural law of the arbitration and the jurisdiction of the DIFC courts as the crucial or supervisory courts.
  • An arbitration
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll