header-logo header-logo

E-discovery challenge

26 November 2009
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house lawyers admit to being foxed when it comes to handling data for litigation or regulatory purposes.

Many corporate counsel consider their company policies and procedures to be unclear and unworkable, with less than one-fifth aware of the existence of policies for collecting and processing data.

Research by KPMG Forensic among more than 200 senior in-house lawyers across the world revealed significant concerns about handling data. 

Half of respondents were concerned about the legal department’s ability to find date and nearly two-fifths admitted it would be difficult to retrieve relevant data in the event of a regulatory investigation or major litigation.

Sixty per cent of respondents had concerns about costs, 56% worried about security issues, and a similar proportion were concerned about records management policies and data volumes.

Counsel felt most confident about dealing with employment and human resources matters and least equipped to cope with competition and
anti-trust investigations.

Communications between legal and IT departments was a major source of concern—more than one-fifth of legal departments were not consulted by IT about changes in storage capabilities, and one quarter are rarely or never consulted about new technologies for dealing with e-discovery.

Paul Tombleson, head of forensic technology at KPMG Forensic in the UK, said: “Companies have to deal with a mind-bogglingly large amount of data being generated every day, which not only has to be stored but made searchable and retrieveable in the future.

Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll