header-logo header-logo

E-protection for authors & artists

16 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , Media , Technology
printer mail-detail
The resale of e-books is unlawful under EU law, according to an Advocate General’s opinion.

The opinion, delivered last week in Tom Kabinet (C-263/18), a Dutch referral, will be welcomed by rightsholders of digital works protected by copyright, including music, films and games as well as e-books, Zoey Forbes, associate in technology, media and entertainment at Harbottle & Lewis, said.

The case arose when Tom Kabinet, an online second hand e-book seller, was sued by the Dutch Publishers Association and the General Publishers Group in a dispute over the extent of distribution rights and the rule of exhaustion. The case centres on when copyright of digital property can be said to be exhausted―is it after the first sale, or at a later stage?

Forbes said: ‘The Opinion also acknowledges the risks to rightsholders that may arise from a second-hand market for e-books, including cannibalisation of the primary market and the increased risk of piracy.

‘Although the Opinion is not binding on the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), it is rare for the CJEU to take a radically different stance, and we therefore expect the CJEU to reach a similar conclusion in its upcoming judgment. However, it is worth noting that the Advocate General recognises that the digitisation of content has upset the traditional balance between the rights of the user and the rightsholders and that there may be practical and policy reasons in favour of the resale of digital works, although the law and other arguments are to the contrary.

‘Much like the US courts in the case of Capitol Records v Redigi, he therefore firmly places any changes to the law in the hands of the EU legislature rather than the judiciary.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll