header-logo header-logo

Early advice, not compulsory mediation

21 June 2023
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Mediation , Family , ADR , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have firmly rejected Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals for mandatory mediation in family cases.

The MoJ consultation on ‘Supporting earlier resolution of private family law arrangements’, which closed last week, suggested mandatory mediation for all suitable family cases—excluding any involving allegations of domestic abuse. Judges could order parents to make a reasonable attempt to mediate, with powers to impose financial penalties where parties acted unreasonably. Mediation for both children and finance arrangements would be fully funded by the government.

However, the proposals were rejected by family lawyers’ group Resolution, as well as the Law Society. Both groups advocated expanding access to legal aid and early advice for all, noting this can often make separating couples more realistic, deterring them from pursuing unreasonable litigation.

Divorce solicitor Katie McCann, managing partner at Lowry Legal, said: ‘The opposition to the government's position on this is totally valid.

‘Mediation needs the consent of both parties participating in the process for it to work. It cannot be forced.

‘Some people are in domestically abusive relationships—no matter their level of assets, this should be vetted at an early stage. The removal of legal aid from this space has, over a number of years, eroded access to justice. It is arguably the removal of this funding which has led to the rise in litigants in person and in turn the bottleneck of cases that the courts are seeing, which has resulted in the formulation of this proposal from the government.’

Grant Cameron, national chair of Resolution, said: ‘We have a real concern that forcing couples into mediation could reduce the likelihood of success.

‘It also raises concerns where the risk of domestic abuse, particularly controlling or coercive behaviour, or other safeguarding issues are at play.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘We are pleased the government is seeking early resolution for families.’

However, she warned that ‘no form of dispute resolution should be mandatory’.

Gemma Davison, partner at Stowe Family Law, said mediation ‘is not an easy option, nor one that is appropriate for everyone and should not be mandatory to achieve a political agenda’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

Cripps—Simon Main

Cripps—Simon Main

Firm strengthens residential property team with partner hire

Hugh James—Danielle Cahill

Hugh James—Danielle Cahill

Private wealth disputes team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
In a very special tribute in this week's NLJ, David Burrows reflects on the retirement of Patrick Allen, co-founder of Hodge Jones & Allen, whose career epitomised the heyday of legal aid
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
back-to-top-scroll