header-logo header-logo

Early advice, not compulsory mediation

21 June 2023
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Mediation , Family , ADR , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have firmly rejected Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals for mandatory mediation in family cases.

The MoJ consultation on ‘Supporting earlier resolution of private family law arrangements’, which closed last week, suggested mandatory mediation for all suitable family cases—excluding any involving allegations of domestic abuse. Judges could order parents to make a reasonable attempt to mediate, with powers to impose financial penalties where parties acted unreasonably. Mediation for both children and finance arrangements would be fully funded by the government.

However, the proposals were rejected by family lawyers’ group Resolution, as well as the Law Society. Both groups advocated expanding access to legal aid and early advice for all, noting this can often make separating couples more realistic, deterring them from pursuing unreasonable litigation.

Divorce solicitor Katie McCann, managing partner at Lowry Legal, said: ‘The opposition to the government's position on this is totally valid.

‘Mediation needs the consent of both parties participating in the process for it to work. It cannot be forced.

‘Some people are in domestically abusive relationships—no matter their level of assets, this should be vetted at an early stage. The removal of legal aid from this space has, over a number of years, eroded access to justice. It is arguably the removal of this funding which has led to the rise in litigants in person and in turn the bottleneck of cases that the courts are seeing, which has resulted in the formulation of this proposal from the government.’

Grant Cameron, national chair of Resolution, said: ‘We have a real concern that forcing couples into mediation could reduce the likelihood of success.

‘It also raises concerns where the risk of domestic abuse, particularly controlling or coercive behaviour, or other safeguarding issues are at play.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘We are pleased the government is seeking early resolution for families.’

However, she warned that ‘no form of dispute resolution should be mandatory’.

Gemma Davison, partner at Stowe Family Law, said mediation ‘is not an easy option, nor one that is appropriate for everyone and should not be mandatory to achieve a political agenda’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll