header-logo header-logo

An Easier Life

27 April 2007 / Stewart Jordan
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Tax , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Stewart Jordan advises on how to administer nil rate band discretionary trusts

Most practitioners, whether advising on lifetime tax planning or advising executors after the death of the first spouse or civil partner, can deliver a well rehearsed speech on the importance of including a nil rate band legacy in wills. This will usually be followed by a broad-brush outline of the mechanics of implementing the arrangement after the first death, ie by using a debt or charge to satisfy the nil rate band legacy in situations where the family home is the most significant asset. Before the trust is constituted, how many practitioners have considered the administrative and compliance aspects of running these trusts?

Consider these typical cases:

  • Scenario 1 There are insufficient liquid assets in the estate to satisfy the entire nil rate band legacy. However, the deceased spouse’s half share of the family home is of sufficient value to satisfy the entire legacy.
  • Scenario 2 The deceased spouse’s half share of the family home is worth less than the nil
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll