header-logo header-logo

Easing the burden

10 July 2008 / Susan Knox
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Features , In-House , E-disclosure , EU
printer mail-detail

Susan Knox outlines the advantages of electronic disclosure in EU litigation

As corporate communications increasingly involve e-mail and other electronic documents, electronic disclosure in disputes is occurring more frequently. Depending on the jurisdiction and the matter, the disclosure of electronic materials may be mandatory. Even where not required, litigation teams are increasingly taking advantage of the latest search and review technologies to prepare the case using electronic materials.

Materials in any matter are likely to be sourced from individuals' desktop and laptop PCs, and work e-mail accounts. These sources, despite corporate rules and policies, are likely to contain irrelevant personal data, including banking and health information, communications with friends, and music files. When collecting electronic evidence it is essential, therefore, that companies and their lawyers observe applicable employment, privacy and data protection laws, while also heeding court orders and considering the company's legal needs.

Disclosure, Data Protection and Privacy

Lawyers must be aware of the rules concerning disclosure in the individual case. These may include court rules of general application, such as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll