header-logo header-logo

18 September 2014
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

eBundling at the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court and Privy Council will begin an electronic bundling pilot next month.

Lawyers will be asked to log in to a Case Lines electronic filing system and submit bundles electronically for cases granted permission from 1 October until the end of March 2015. This will replace the current practice, where lawyers send in pdfs on memory sticks. Parties granted permission to appeal before 1 October are also welcome to use the eBundle system although it is not mandatory.

The process has certain advantages built in, for example, it has bookmarks which makes it easier for a justice working on their laptop to navigate the bundle, and read-only access can be granted to other parties.

A spokesperson emphasised that the court will not be paperless, and lawyers must continue to send paper copies of all documents in to the registry. He said the court will review the pilot in March and decide whether to pilot other products, adopt the new system or revert to the old system.

The court has issued guidelines on the new system, describing the six stages involved in filing an eBundle and setting out the practical steps required at each stage.

Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll