header-logo header-logo

ECJ needs more judges

29 April 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Current backlog of cases “unacceptable”

Peers have called for more judges and a further three Advocates-General to be appointed to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to clear an “unacceptable” backlog of cases.

There are currently 27 judges and eight Advocates-General at the ECJ. A report by the Lords Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection EU sub-committee, published this week, noted that intellectual property cases take an average of 20 months to be decided by the General Court, while other actions take an average 33 months.

The number of new cases before the court almost doubled between 2000 and 2010, although recent figures show a reduction in the number of pending cases.

Lord Bowness, Committee chair, said: “The number of pending cases before the court continues to rise year on year.

“It is crucial that the right balance is struck between the length of time it takes for the court to dispose of a case and the quality of its judgments, in order to preserve its credibility.”

The sub-committee recommended an increase in the number of advocates general in 2011, and the ECJ has since requested an increase. However, before the UK government can vote in the European Council to support this, it needs to have resolutions to that effect from both Houses of Parliament. In this week's report, Workload of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Follow-up Report, the sub-committee urges the government to speed this process up.

 

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll