header-logo header-logo

ECJ needs more judges

29 April 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Current backlog of cases “unacceptable”

Peers have called for more judges and a further three Advocates-General to be appointed to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to clear an “unacceptable” backlog of cases.

There are currently 27 judges and eight Advocates-General at the ECJ. A report by the Lords Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection EU sub-committee, published this week, noted that intellectual property cases take an average of 20 months to be decided by the General Court, while other actions take an average 33 months.

The number of new cases before the court almost doubled between 2000 and 2010, although recent figures show a reduction in the number of pending cases.

Lord Bowness, Committee chair, said: “The number of pending cases before the court continues to rise year on year.

“It is crucial that the right balance is struck between the length of time it takes for the court to dispose of a case and the quality of its judgments, in order to preserve its credibility.”

The sub-committee recommended an increase in the number of advocates general in 2011, and the ECJ has since requested an increase. However, before the UK government can vote in the European Council to support this, it needs to have resolutions to that effect from both Houses of Parliament. In this week's report, Workload of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Follow-up Report, the sub-committee urges the government to speed this process up.

 

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll