header-logo header-logo

ECJ needs more judges

29 April 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Current backlog of cases “unacceptable”

Peers have called for more judges and a further three Advocates-General to be appointed to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to clear an “unacceptable” backlog of cases.

There are currently 27 judges and eight Advocates-General at the ECJ. A report by the Lords Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection EU sub-committee, published this week, noted that intellectual property cases take an average of 20 months to be decided by the General Court, while other actions take an average 33 months.

The number of new cases before the court almost doubled between 2000 and 2010, although recent figures show a reduction in the number of pending cases.

Lord Bowness, Committee chair, said: “The number of pending cases before the court continues to rise year on year.

“It is crucial that the right balance is struck between the length of time it takes for the court to dispose of a case and the quality of its judgments, in order to preserve its credibility.”

The sub-committee recommended an increase in the number of advocates general in 2011, and the ECJ has since requested an increase. However, before the UK government can vote in the European Council to support this, it needs to have resolutions to that effect from both Houses of Parliament. In this week's report, Workload of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Follow-up Report, the sub-committee urges the government to speed this process up.

 

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll