header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007 / Gregory Mitchell
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Economic tort (2)

Should the tort of conversion apply to intangible property? Gregory Mitchell QC investigates

The tort of conversion is increasingly significant in the electronic world where intangible rights are held for their true “owners” without being evidenced or comprised in a piece of paper or other chattel such as a cheque or certificate. The majority (three) of the law lords in OBG v Allan Ltd [2007] UKHL 21, [2007] All ER (D) 44 (May) held that the tort of conversion is limited to chattels only. Intangible rights can be converted only so far as those rights are sufficiently connected with a chattel and where rights of ownership in the chattel are usurped. There was a powerful minority view from Lord Nicholls and Baroness Hale that English law should be extended.

BACKGROUND

In OBG the defendants were appointed in June 1992 over a company as administrative receivers. They took possession of the company’s assets and assumed the right to manage its business. The company had circa 88 different contracts with one major customer under which there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll