header-logo header-logo

Economic tort (2)

05 July 2007 / Gregory Mitchell
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Should the tort of conversion apply to intangible property? Gregory Mitchell QC investigates

The tort of conversion is increasingly significant in the electronic world where intangible rights are held for their true “owners” without being evidenced or comprised in a piece of paper or other chattel such as a cheque or certificate. The majority (three) of the law lords in OBG v Allan Ltd [2007] UKHL 21, [2007] All ER (D) 44 (May) held that the tort of conversion is limited to chattels only. Intangible rights can be converted only so far as those rights are sufficiently connected with a chattel and where rights of ownership in the chattel are usurped. There was a powerful minority view from Lord Nicholls and Baroness Hale that English law should be extended.

BACKGROUND

In OBG the defendants were appointed in June 1992 over a company as administrative receivers. They took possession of the company’s assets and assumed the right to manage its business. The company had circa 88 different contracts with one major customer under which there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll