header-logo header-logo

Elected judges?

12 March 2014
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Why the UK is better off with unelected judges

While certain newspapers, such as the Daily Mail, may rant about “unelected judges” making rulings on human rights, the EU and other controversial subjects, the UK should hang onto its system of appointing not electing judges at all costs, according to Peter Thompson QC, general editor of Civil Court Practice (The Green Book). Writing in NLJ this week, Thompson points out how the US Supreme Court was divided by party allegiances over the Bush/Gore hanging chad case in 2000. He writes: “There must surely be some concern that the judge will not want to let down the political party which got him, or her, elected.”

Issue: 7598 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll