header-logo header-logo

11 December 2019 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Election postscript: time to register?

13029
Bethan Walsh discusses what charities need to know about politics
  • Potential pitfalls for charities.
  • Electoral law and the purpose test.

With the most recent national election now behind us, it’s important that charity trustees understand their responsibilities when it comes to campaigning ahead of elections and referendums.

It’s perfectly acceptable for charities to speak up for the causes they support. However, what is not acceptable is appearing to take a political position on either side. Charities must be, and be seen to be, independent from party politics.

In this article we take a look at the key points of both charity law and electoral law that charities should be aware of

Charity law

Generally, charities must not support any one political party. They can support policies which contribute to the delivery of their own charitable purposes provided that their independence is maintained. During an election period, the need for impartiality and balance is intensified, and charities must take extra care when undertaking activities in the political arena.

Potential pitfalls

Charities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll