header-logo header-logo

11 December 2019 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Election postscript: time to register?

13029
Bethan Walsh discusses what charities need to know about politics
  • Potential pitfalls for charities.
  • Electoral law and the purpose test.

With the most recent national election now behind us, it’s important that charity trustees understand their responsibilities when it comes to campaigning ahead of elections and referendums.

It’s perfectly acceptable for charities to speak up for the causes they support. However, what is not acceptable is appearing to take a political position on either side. Charities must be, and be seen to be, independent from party politics.

In this article we take a look at the key points of both charity law and electoral law that charities should be aware of

Charity law

Generally, charities must not support any one political party. They can support policies which contribute to the delivery of their own charitable purposes provided that their independence is maintained. During an election period, the need for impartiality and balance is intensified, and charities must take extra care when undertaking activities in the political arena.

Potential pitfalls

Charities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll