header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Elections

R (on the application of Woolas) v The Parliamentary Election Court [2010] EWHC 3169 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 60 (Dec)

The Administrative Court, sitting as a Divisional Court, had jurisdiction to consider the interpretation of s 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983. The scope of review was not confined to an excess of jurisdiction in the narrow sense, but extended to correcting errors made in the law it had to apply. 

In deciding an issue under s 106, the court had to decide whether the statement in question was one as to the personal character or conduct or a statement as to the political position or character of the candidate. It could not be both. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
Law firm trainees are choosing US firms over their UK comparators, according to Chambers’ annual report on UK trainee satisfaction
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
back-to-top-scroll