header-logo header-logo

30 May 2013
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Elections

Shindler v United Kingdom (App No 19840/09) [2013] ECHR 19840/09, [2013] All ER (D) 239 (May)

The applicant was a British national who had moved to Italy in 1982. Under the Representation of the People Act 1983, British citizens residing overseas for less than 15 years were permitted to vote in parliamentary elections in the UK. The applicant did not meet that criterion. He complained to the European Court of Human Rights that his right to Art 3 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights had been violated. In dismissing the application, the court held that the rights bestowed by Art 3 of the First Protocol to the Convention were not absolute. There was room for implied limitations and contracting states had to be allowed a margin of appreciation in that sphere. For a measure to be deemed compatible with the right to vote, the conditions to which the right to vote was made subject could not curtail the right to such an extent as to impair its very essence and deprive it of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll