header-logo header-logo

Electronic billing: fasten your seat belts

30 April 2018 / Claire Green
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7793_green_1

Claire Green predicts a turbulent start for the newly introduced electronic bill of costs

  • The electronic bill of costs is now compulsory in the county court and Senior Courts Costs Office.
  • It is required for multi-track claims, but with exceptions.
  • It is inevitable that the new bill will be a work in progress for some time, but none of the problems are expected to be insurmountable

Buckle up. The electronic bill of costs became compulsory in the county court and Senior Courts Costs Office on 6 April. It is likely to be a bumpy ride.

Whether it is solicitors caught unaware or untested rules that cause confusion, we expect to see plenty of teething problems as the new provisions settle in.

A quick reminder

First a quick reminder. The new bill is required for all multi-track claims, except those:

  • in which the proceedings are subject to fixed costs or scale costs;
  • where the receiving party is unrepresented; or
  • where the court has otherwise ordered.

It is in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll