header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 June 2019 / James Tipler , Paul Letman
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

Electronic Communications Code: Stay tuned

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The new Electronic Communications Code: James Tipler & Paul Letman share seven key takeaways 18 months on from implementation
  • The meaning and application of the new code.
  • The arguments canvassed and tested on behalf of landowners and operators so far.

Since the eagerly anticipated entry into force of the new Electronic Communications Code (the code) on 28 December 2017, the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (the tribunal) has offered a wealth of insights on the meaning and application in practice of the new code in the seven references that have been decided and reported reported as at 1 June 2019, which all merit a close reading in full. This article highlights one key takeaway point from each.

1. The right to carry out a preliminary site survey and inspections—a so-called ‘multi-skilled visit’ (MSV)—is a code right: CTIL v University of London [2018] UKUT 0356 (LC)

Entry onto a potential site to assess its suitability for hosting Electronic Communications Apparatus (ECA) with the aid of persons with expertise across a range of different disciplines—the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll