header-logo header-logo

Electronic storm

02 September 2011 / Julian Copeman
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Julian Copeman seeks the truth behind the e-mail trail

The impact of the widespread use of e-mail over the last 15 years is well known to litigators and courts alike. E-mail exchanges have come to provide a vivid minute-by-minute contemporaneous record of relevant events which allows courts to reconstruct who said what to whom and when in a way that once could only be hazily or contentiously reconstructed from later oral evidence. Lawyers and courts are well used to the disclosure and review of metadata to assist with questions of who drafted what aspects of documents and when. Further, e-mail forms part of the tsunami of electronic documentation which has fundamentally altered the extent, cost of and approach to, disclosure.

Fixed with knowledge

An issue of increasing concern to business people inundated with e-mails is the presumption that they have read any e-mail that is delivered to their inbox, and the worry that they will later be fixed with knowledge of a particular matter as a result of being copied into an e-mail they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll