header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Julian Copeman
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Electronic storm

Julian Copeman seeks the truth behind the e-mail trail

The impact of the widespread use of e-mail over the last 15 years is well known to litigators and courts alike. E-mail exchanges have come to provide a vivid minute-by-minute contemporaneous record of relevant events which allows courts to reconstruct who said what to whom and when in a way that once could only be hazily or contentiously reconstructed from later oral evidence. Lawyers and courts are well used to the disclosure and review of metadata to assist with questions of who drafted what aspects of documents and when. Further, e-mail forms part of the tsunami of electronic documentation which has fundamentally altered the extent, cost of and approach to, disclosure.

Fixed with knowledge

An issue of increasing concern to business people inundated with e-mails is the presumption that they have read any e-mail that is delivered to their inbox, and the worry that they will later be fixed with knowledge of a particular matter as a result of being copied into an e-mail they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll