header-logo header-logo

16 May 2025 / Brendan Udokoro , Kiera Quinn
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

Electronic wills: progress or peril?

218601
Could we soon be tapping out wills on our phones, ask Brendan Udokoro & Kiera Quinn
  • Explores the non-contentious and contentious perspectives on the concept of electronic wills.
  • While technology offers individuals greater accessibility, convenience and freedoms, it also introduces significant risks of fraud, undue influence and costly litigation.
  • As other jurisdictions begin to embrace electronic wills, the article considers whether we should follow, or whether doing so would create far greater legal issues than they would resolve.

In early 2024, it was reported that pop star Max George, of British boy band The Wanted, had written a will on his mobile phone while he was in hospital undergoing life-saving surgery. Without time to consult a solicitor or execute a traditional will, he documented his urgent testamentary wishes electronically, on his mobile phone. The story sparked public debate: is this the future of will-making and should the law recognise electronic wills in this jurisdiction, or are we just ‘chasing the sun’?

The case for electronic wills

Contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll