header-logo header-logo

16 May 2025 / Brendan Udokoro , Kiera Quinn
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

Electronic wills: progress or peril?

218601
Could we soon be tapping out wills on our phones, ask Brendan Udokoro & Kiera Quinn
  • Explores the non-contentious and contentious perspectives on the concept of electronic wills.
  • While technology offers individuals greater accessibility, convenience and freedoms, it also introduces significant risks of fraud, undue influence and costly litigation.
  • As other jurisdictions begin to embrace electronic wills, the article considers whether we should follow, or whether doing so would create far greater legal issues than they would resolve.

In early 2024, it was reported that pop star Max George, of British boy band The Wanted, had written a will on his mobile phone while he was in hospital undergoing life-saving surgery. Without time to consult a solicitor or execute a traditional will, he documented his urgent testamentary wishes electronically, on his mobile phone. The story sparked public debate: is this the future of will-making and should the law recognise electronic wills in this jurisdiction, or are we just ‘chasing the sun’?

The case for electronic wills

Contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll