header-logo header-logo

Electronic wills: progress or peril?

16 May 2025 / Brendan Udokoro , Kiera Quinn
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail
218601
Could we soon be tapping out wills on our phones, ask Brendan Udokoro & Kiera Quinn
  • Explores the non-contentious and contentious perspectives on the concept of electronic wills.
  • While technology offers individuals greater accessibility, convenience and freedoms, it also introduces significant risks of fraud, undue influence and costly litigation.
  • As other jurisdictions begin to embrace electronic wills, the article considers whether we should follow, or whether doing so would create far greater legal issues than they would resolve.

In early 2024, it was reported that pop star Max George, of British boy band The Wanted, had written a will on his mobile phone while he was in hospital undergoing life-saving surgery. Without time to consult a solicitor or execute a traditional will, he documented his urgent testamentary wishes electronically, on his mobile phone. The story sparked public debate: is this the future of will-making and should the law recognise electronic wills in this jurisdiction, or are we just ‘chasing the sun’?

The case for electronic wills

Contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll