header-logo header-logo

Empathy pays dividends, banks discover

14 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail
Banks need to rethink their complaints handling and use a more ‘human touch’ if they are to avoid repeating the mistakes of the 2008 financial crisis, an independent dispute resolution body has advised

A live pilot has been ongoing since the end of 2019, where banks make efforts to understand the personal circumstances of each SME, appoint a customer champion to each case to help customers identify the most important documents, and take account of their preferred means of communication. It has taken on board more than 40 complaints from SMEs so far, some stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.

The Business Banking Resolution Service (BBRS), a coalition of seven banks and other stakeholders who are running the pilot, published its interim findings in a report this week. It concluded that the findings indicate that the system needs to be reformed to take the stress and acrimony out of disputes.

According to the report, ‘the BBRS team initially focusses on conversations by phone to interact with customers and learn about the individual complaints, rather than burdening customers with filling in lengthy complaint forms at the very outset.

‘The emphasis is on balancing the need for collecting enough vital information about the complaint as early as possible while not losing the human touch and treating customers with empathy.’ The team also recognises the extra stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the devastating impact this is having on business activity.

Lewis Shand Smith, the BBRS independent Chair, said: ‘It has never been more important for British businesses to get fair treatment from their banks.

‘Doing so will, in turn, safeguard the reputation of the sector. The BBRS will play a vital role in making sure this happens. In establishing our service, we have recognised the need for a deep rethink of the way disputes between SMEs and their banks are handled.

‘The live pilot is adopting a human and flexible approach, as an alternative to the stress and cost of seeking to resolve complaints through the courts.’

Alexandra Marks, Chief Adjudicator at the BBRS, said: ‘We have been discovering a lot about some difficult and often distressing cases, and the importance of handling these sensitively as well as fairly.

‘When dealing with disputes it is not possible to please everyone all of the time, but our ambition as an independent organisation is to reach fair and reasonable outcomes which bring closure to both parties.’

Find out more at: https://thebbrs.org.

Read the report, ‘Live pilot: interim findings’, at: https://staging-thebbrs.kinsta.cloud/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BBRS_Live_Pilot_Interim_Report_15_05_2020.pdf.

 

Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Pensions litigation team announces senior associate hire

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Firm appoints new chief financial officer

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Social purpose firm announces director hire plus eight promotions

NEWS
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll