header-logo header-logo

Employee claims rise

20 June 2019
Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
The outstanding caseload in the UK’s tribunals has increased by 8% on this time last year, driven by an increase in employment tribunal claims.

According to the quarterly tribunal statistics up to the end of March, receipts, disposals and caseload for single claims at employment tribunals rose 6%, 22% and 39%, respectively, on last year.

For multiple employment claims, receipts and caseload outstanding rose 13% and 19% while disposals fell by 16%.

Employment lawyer Brian Gegg, partner at BDB Pitmans, said the rise ‘was an expected result from tribunal fees being abolished’, and showed that employees are now becoming more prepared to issue claims.

The government has paid out £17.3m under the employment tribunal fee refund scheme, up to the end of March (21,700 out of 22,000 applications received).

Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll