header-logo header-logo

Employers unsure on default retirement

05 August 2010
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age (DRA) will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.
The government has said it will phase out the DRA from 6 April 2011. All accompanying statutory retirement procedures, such as the right of employees to request to work beyond their retirement age, will be removed. 

Employers will continue to be able to justify objectively a compulsory retirement age  as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
John Cridland, CBI deputy director-general, says that scrapping the DRA will leave a vacuum, and raise a large number of complex legal and employment questions, which the government has not yet addressed, creating uncertainty among employers and staff, who do not know where they stand. “There will need to be more than a code of practice to address these practical issues,” he says.

Stephen Riley, director of specialist recruiters Intapeople, says the decision to abandon the DRA could have major repercussions for the UK’s younger workers. “A typical scenario after a senior member of staff retires is that a colleague is promoted  and a junior-level worker is brought on board. Any delay in this process puts additional pressure on the government to find new ways of encouraging business growth and creating jobs for our younger population.” (Read more)

Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll