header-logo header-logo

Employers unsure on default retirement

05 August 2010
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age (DRA) will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.
The government has said it will phase out the DRA from 6 April 2011. All accompanying statutory retirement procedures, such as the right of employees to request to work beyond their retirement age, will be removed. 

Employers will continue to be able to justify objectively a compulsory retirement age  as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
John Cridland, CBI deputy director-general, says that scrapping the DRA will leave a vacuum, and raise a large number of complex legal and employment questions, which the government has not yet addressed, creating uncertainty among employers and staff, who do not know where they stand. “There will need to be more than a code of practice to address these practical issues,” he says.

Stephen Riley, director of specialist recruiters Intapeople, says the decision to abandon the DRA could have major repercussions for the UK’s younger workers. “A typical scenario after a senior member of staff retires is that a colleague is promoted  and a junior-level worker is brought on board. Any delay in this process puts additional pressure on the government to find new ways of encouraging business growth and creating jobs for our younger population.” (Read more)

Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll