header-logo header-logo

Employers unsure on default retirement

05 August 2010
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.

Business representatives have warned the decision to scrap the Default Retirement Age (DRA) will raise “complex legal and employment questions”.
The government has said it will phase out the DRA from 6 April 2011. All accompanying statutory retirement procedures, such as the right of employees to request to work beyond their retirement age, will be removed. 

Employers will continue to be able to justify objectively a compulsory retirement age  as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
John Cridland, CBI deputy director-general, says that scrapping the DRA will leave a vacuum, and raise a large number of complex legal and employment questions, which the government has not yet addressed, creating uncertainty among employers and staff, who do not know where they stand. “There will need to be more than a code of practice to address these practical issues,” he says.

Stephen Riley, director of specialist recruiters Intapeople, says the decision to abandon the DRA could have major repercussions for the UK’s younger workers. “A typical scenario after a senior member of staff retires is that a colleague is promoted  and a junior-level worker is brought on board. Any delay in this process puts additional pressure on the government to find new ways of encouraging business growth and creating jobs for our younger population.” (Read more)

Issue: 7429 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll