header-logo header-logo

04 June 2010
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 571, [2010] All ER (D) 247 (May)

Whether parties intended the provisions relating to disciplinary procedures to sound in damages depended on the true construction of the contract. There was no reason why the parties should not be able to agree that they did sound in damages.

Moreover, dismissal was often the final step in a continuing course of conduct, in cases where the claimant relied on the common law implied term it would sometimes be necessary to determine whether the act relied on formed part of the process of dismissal or preceded it.

However, the need for that enquiry did not arise in a case where the employee relied on an express term of the contract and accordingly in such cases the exclusion area was not a relevant concept.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll