header-logo header-logo

Employment

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1565, [2011] All ER (D) 106 (Dec)

The natural and ordinary meaning of the language of reg 7(1) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246), did not require a particular transfer or transferee to be in existence or in contemplation at the time of the dismissal. The exercise under reg 7(1) only had to be carried out if there had been both a dismissal, which was claimed to be automatically unfair, and a relevant transfer. If, on the one hand, no relevant transfer had ever taken place, there would be no basis for making a claim for automatic unfair dismissal for a transfer-related reason. The regulation would simply not have been engaged. If, on the other hand, a dismissal and a relevant transfer had taken place, the regulation could be engaged.

The employment tribunal was then required by the regulation to look to the fact of dismissal and, as a matter of the objective assessment of the evidence, to determine the reason for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll