header-logo header-logo

Employment

03 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hewage v Grampian Health Board [2012] UKSC 37, [2012] All ER (D) 253 (Jul)

The points made by the Court of Appeal about the effect of s 63A(2) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and s 54A(2) of the Race Discrimination Act 1976 in Igen Ltd v Wong [2005] IRLR 258 and Madarassy v Nomura International plc [2007] IRLR 246 could not be more clearly expressed, and there was no need for any further guidance. Furthermore, as Underhill J pointed out in Martin v Devonshires Solicitors [2011] All ER (D) 345 (Mar), it was important not to make too much of the role of the burden of proof provisions. They would require careful attention where there was room for doubt as to the facts necessary to establish discrimination. But they had nothing to offer where the tribunal was in a position to make positive findings on the evidence one way or the other.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll