header-logo header-logo

Employment

03 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hewage v Grampian Health Board [2012] UKSC 37, [2012] All ER (D) 253 (Jul)

The points made by the Court of Appeal about the effect of s 63A(2) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and s 54A(2) of the Race Discrimination Act 1976 in Igen Ltd v Wong [2005] IRLR 258 and Madarassy v Nomura International plc [2007] IRLR 246 could not be more clearly expressed, and there was no need for any further guidance. Furthermore, as Underhill J pointed out in Martin v Devonshires Solicitors [2011] All ER (D) 345 (Mar), it was important not to make too much of the role of the burden of proof provisions. They would require careful attention where there was room for doubt as to the facts necessary to establish discrimination. But they had nothing to offer where the tribunal was in a position to make positive findings on the evidence one way or the other.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll