header-logo header-logo

Employment

08 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sivanandan and others v Hackney London Borough [2013] EWCA Civ 22, [2013] All ER (D) 234 (Jan)

The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (CLIA 1978) was concerned, as the title indicated, with the notion of one tortfeasor recovering contribution from another tortfeasor, or from other tortfeasors, liable in respect of the same damage, whether jointly with him or otherwise. CLIA 1978 did not deal with the allocation, as between different tortfeasors, of different degrees of responsibility to the claimant for the damage suffered. As the Employment Appeal Tribunal pointed out, it was not settled at present whether the employment tribunal had jurisdiction over contribution claims, or whether there would have to be separate contribution proceedings in the county court.

The decision in Way [2005] ICR 1362 had been cited as recognising the existence of a discretion exercisable by the ET either (a) to apportion liability for the total sum awarded to a claimant as between the different respondents to a claim, or (b) to make a joint and several award under which each respondent would be liable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll