header-logo header-logo

18 May 2017
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Dr Day v Health Education England [2017] EWCA Civ 329, [2017] All ER (D) 71 (May)

The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal by the appellant in respect of the extended definition of worker in s 43K(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and on the issue of whether the Employment Tribunal had ‘substantially determined’ the terms of engagement of the appellant doctor.

Issue: 7746 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll