header-logo header-logo

Employment: Against the clock

Has Matuszowicz reset the clock for employers dealing with DDA 1995 claims? Tom Poole reports

Once an employer knows, or reasonably should know, that one of its employees is a disabled person within the meaning of s 1(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995), it is under a duty to make reasonable adjustments to ensure that the employee is not placed at a substantial disadvantage in comparison to those people who are not disabled.

The duty to make reasonable adjustments, the nature of which is central to disability discrimination legislation, is unique from the duties imposed by other anti-discrimination legislation, eg it is possible for an employer to fail to comply with the duty by way of either deliberate conduct or inadvertent omission. No problem arises in relation to the definition of acts of discrimination in this respect. However, a problem does arise when one considers the provisions defining the period within which proceedings must be brought, contained in DDA 1995, Sch 3, para 3.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll