header-logo header-logo

Employment—Equal pay claims—Jurisdiction

08 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Abdulla and others v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1412, [2011] All ER (D) 210 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Davis LLJ and Dame Janet Smith, 29 Nov 2011

The expiration of the limitation period for presenting equal pay proceedings to the employment tribunal is a circumstance of considerable weight in deciding whether to strike out in-time equal pay claims in the ordinary courts under s 2(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970).

Paul Epstein QC and Louise Chudleigh (instructed by Birmingham City Council Legal and Democratic Service) for the authority. Andrew Short QC and Naomi Ling (instructed by Leigh Day & Co) for the claimants.

The claimants were formerly in the employment of the appellant local authority and were mostly women. They brought an equal pay claim against the authority in the High Court alleging a breach of contract on the part of the authority as employer in not complying with its contractual obligations as modified by the equality clause implied into those contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll