header-logo header-logo

Employment—Equal pay claims—Jurisdiction

08 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Abdulla and others v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1412, [2011] All ER (D) 210 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Davis LLJ and Dame Janet Smith, 29 Nov 2011

The expiration of the limitation period for presenting equal pay proceedings to the employment tribunal is a circumstance of considerable weight in deciding whether to strike out in-time equal pay claims in the ordinary courts under s 2(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970).

Paul Epstein QC and Louise Chudleigh (instructed by Birmingham City Council Legal and Democratic Service) for the authority. Andrew Short QC and Naomi Ling (instructed by Leigh Day & Co) for the claimants.

The claimants were formerly in the employment of the appellant local authority and were mostly women. They brought an equal pay claim against the authority in the High Court alleging a breach of contract on the part of the authority as employer in not complying with its contractual obligations as modified by the equality clause implied into those contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll