header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Employment—Equality of treatment of men and women—Equal pay for equal work

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
02 November 2012
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Birmingham City Council v Abdulla and others [2012] UKSC 47

Supreme Court, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath, 24 October 2012

On the true construction of the first part of s 2(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970) and s 128(1) of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), a claim in respect of the operation of an equality clause can never be more conveniently disposed of by the tribunal if it would thereby be time-barred.

Andrew Short QC and Naomi Ling (instructed by Leigh Day & Co) for the claimants. Paul Espstein QC, Louise Chudleigh and Nathan Caiden (instructed by Birmingham City Council Legal and Democratic Services) for the authority.

The claimants were formerly employed by the defendant local authority and were mostly women. They brought an equal pay claim against the authority in the High Court. The claims would have been out of time had they been issued in the employment tribunal,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: What judging really demands
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
NLJ this week: AI comes for the billable hour
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
NLJ this week: Civil procedure—sharp elbows & sharper warnings
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
NLJ this week: Getting the facts right in family courts
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
NLJ this week: Sporting justice—at sprint speed
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll