header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Thomas v Farr plc [2007] EWCA Civ 118, [2007] All ER (D) 240 (Feb)

To establish that a non-competition clause in an employment contract was reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer’s interest in confidential information, the employer must first establish that, at the time of the contract, the nature of the proposed employment was such as would expose the employee to information of the kind capable of protection beyond the end of the contract, ie trade secrets or other information of equivalent confidentiality.

If the employer overcomes that hurdle, it is no argument against a restrictive covenant that it may be difficult for either the employer or the employee to know where exactly the line may lie between information which remains confidential after the end of the employment and information which does not.

The fact that the distinction can be hard to draw may support the reasonableness of a non-competition clause, since it is because there may be serious difficulties in identifying precisely what is or what is not confidential information that a non-competition clause

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll