header-logo header-logo

EMPLOYMENT LAW

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Thomas v Farr plc [2007] EWCA Civ 118, [2007] All ER (D) 240 (Feb)

To establish that a non-competition clause in an employment contract was reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer’s interest in confidential information, the employer must first establish that, at the time of the contract, the nature of the proposed employment was such as would expose the employee to information of the kind capable of protection beyond the end of the contract, ie trade secrets or other information of equivalent confidentiality.

If the employer overcomes that hurdle, it is no argument against a restrictive covenant that it may be difficult for either the employer or the employee to know where exactly the line may lie between information which remains confidential after the end of the employment and information which does not.

The fact that the distinction can be hard to draw may support the reasonableness of a non-competition clause, since it is because there may be serious difficulties in identifying precisely what is or what is not confidential information that a non-competition clause

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll